The day I was born, Not that you care.

Apperently quite a few people died the day i was born.

Maybe not all in the same year but on the same day.

Check It out :]

People who died on January 03, 1993 (the exact day I was born)

* Johnny Most, American sports announcer

Unusual Deaths in 1993

* Brandon lee, son of bruce lee, was shot and killed by a prop .44 magnum gun while filming the movie the crow. a cartridge with only a primer and a bullet was fired in the pistol prior to the scene brandon was in; this caused a squib load, in which the primer provided enough force to push the bullet out of the cartridge and into the barrel of the revolver, where it became stuck. the malfunction went unnoticed by the crew, and the same gun was used again later to shoot the death scene, having been re-loaded with blanks. however, the squib load was still lodged in the barrel, and was propelled by the blank cartridge’s explosion out of the barrel and into lee’s body. although the bullet was traveling much slower than a normally fired bullet would be, the bullet’s large size and the nearly point-blank firing distance made it powerful enough to severely wound lee. it was not instantly recognized by the crew or other actors; they believed he was still acting. interestingly, the incident was almost an exact replica of a scene in his father bruce lee’s last film “game of death”, during the filming of which bruce lee also died. even more bizarrely yet; the plot of game of death revolved around bruce lee’s character, a kung-fu actor, faking his own death - by pretending to have been hit by an accidentally fired real bullet while filming a scene where hundreds of blanks were fired at him.
* Garry hoy, a toronto lawyer, fell to his death after he threw himself through the glass wall on the 24th floor of the toronto-dominion centre in order to prove the glass was “unbreakable.”

Natural disasters in 1993

* Great Flood of 1993
* Storm of the Century (1993)
* Virginia Tornado Outbreak

People who died on January 03 (various years)

* 2007 - Michael Yeats, Irish Fianna Fáil senator 1961–1981 and son of W.B. Yeats
* 2007 - Sir Cecil Walker, Ulster Unionist Member of Parliament for North Belfast 1983–2001
* 2007 - William Verity Jr., United States Secretary of Commerce 1987-1989
* 2007 - Earl Reibel, Canadian ice hockey forward Detroit Red Wings
* 2007 - Janos Furst, Hungarian-born orchestral conductor
* 2006 - Bill Skate, Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea
* 2006 - Steve Rogers, Australian rugby league footballer
* 2005 - Will Eisner, American comic book artist
* 2005 - JN Dixit, Indian government official
* 2005 - Koo Chen-fu, Chinese negotiator
* 2004 - Leon Wagner, American baseball player
* 2003 - Sid Gillman, American football coach
* 2002 - Freddy Heineken, Dutch beer executive
* 2002 - Juan García Esquivel, Mexican band leader
* 1992 - Dame Judith Anderson, Australian actress
* 1989 - Sergei Lvovich Sobolev, Russian mathematician
* 1988 - Rose Ausländer, German poet
* 1981 - Princess Alice of Albany
* 1980 - Lucien Buysse, Belgian cyclist
* 1980 - Joy Adamson, Czech conservationist
* 1979 - Conrad Hilton, American hotelier
* 1974 - Gino Cervi, Italian actor
* 1969 - Howard McNear, American actor
* 1969 - Jean Focas, Greco-French astronomer
* 1967 - Jack Ruby, American killer of Lee Harvey Oswald
* 1967 - Mary Garden, Scottish singer
* 1963 - Jack Carson, Canadian actor
* 1956 - Joseph Wirth, 5th Chancellor of the Weimar Republic (Germany)
* 1956 - Alexander Gretchaninov, Russian composer
* 1950 - Emil Jannings, Swiss actor
* 1946 - William Joyce, American Nazi propagandist (executed)
* 1945 - Ferdynand Antoni Ossendowski, Polish writer
* 1945 - Edgar Cayce, American psychic
* 1944 - Jurgis Baltrušaitis, Lithuanian poet
* 1933 - Jack Pickford, Canadian actor
* 1933 - Wilhelm Cuno, 6th Chancellor of the Weimar Republic (Germany)
* 1931 - Joseph Joffre, French general
* 1927 - Carle David Tolmé Runge, German physicist
* 1923 - Jaroslav Hasek, Czech novelist
* 1916 - Grenville M. Dodge, American Civil War Union Army Major General
* 1915 - James Elroy Flecker, English author
* 1911 - Alexandros Papadiamantis, Greek author
* 1903 - Alois Hitler, father of Adolf Hilter
* 1882 - William Harrison Ainsworth, English novelist
* 1875 - Pierre Larousse, French editor
* 1826 - Louis Gabriel Suchet, French marshal
* 1795 - Josiah Wedgwood, English potter
* 1785 - Baldassare Galuppi, Italian composer
* 1779 - Claude Bourgelat, French veterinary surgeon
* 1743 - Ferdinando Galli-Bibiena, Italian architect and designer
* 1690 - Hillel ben Naphtali Zevi, Lithuanian rabbi
* 1670 - George Monck, 1st Duke of Albemarle, English soldier
* 1656 - Mathieu Molé, French statesman
* 1641 - Jeremiah Horrocks, English astronomer
* 1543 - Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, Portuguese explorer
* 1437 - Catherine of Valois, wife of Henry V of England
* 1322 - King Philip V of France
* 1098 - Walkelin, first Norman bishop of Winchester (b. unknown)
148,804 People died when I was born

^^^^^^
Click to see how many people died on your birthday :]

Google hacking. That you don’t care about.

Find usernames, passwords, police records, how many kids some has+where they graduated+where they live+when the got married+where they currently work, stuff not to be viewed by the public, ect.

Yepp.

If you look around you can find some pretty intresting stuff. All with Google!!

http://johnny.ihackstuff.com/ghdb.php

Some paradoxes - an anthology, that you don’t care about

I recently found a ton of these I think they’re pretty cool :]

I thought they were Interesting so maybe you will

I’m gonna list a couple of my favorites.

“Which is better, eternal happiness or a ham sandwich? It would appear that eternal happiness is better, but this is really not so! After all, nothing is better than eternal happiness, and a ham sandwich is certainly better than nothing. Therefore a ham sandwich is better than eternal happiness.”

“Two closed boxes, Bl and B2, are on a table. Bl contains $1,000. B2 contains either nothing or $1 million. You do not know which. You have an irrevocable choice between two actions:

1. Take what is in both boxes.
2. Take only what is in B2.

At some time before the test a superior Being has made a prediction about what you will decide. It is not necessary to assume determinism. You only need be persuaded that the Being’s predictions are “almost certainly” correct. If you like, you can think of the Being as God, but the paradox is just as strong if you regard the Being as a superior intelligence from another planet or a supercomputer capable of probing your brain and making highly accurate predictions about your decisions. If the Being expects you to choose both boxes, he has left B2 empty. If he expects you to take only B2, he has put $1 million in it. (If he expects you to randomize your choice by, say, flipping a coin, he has left B2 empty.) In all cases Bl contains $1,000. You understand the situation fully, the Being knows you understand, you know that he knows, and so on.

What should you do? Clearly it is not to your advantage to flip a coin, so that you must decide on your own. The paradox lies in the disturbing fact that a strong argument can be made for either decision. Both arguments cannot be right. The problem is to explain why one is wrong.

Let us look first at the argument for taking only B2. You believe the Being is an excellent predictor. If you take both boxes, the Being almost certainly will have anticipated your action and have left B2 empty. You will get only the $1,000 in Bl. On the other hand, if you take only B2, the Being, expecting that, almost certainly will have placed $1 million in it. Clearly it is to your advantage to take only B2.

Convincing? Yes, but the Being made his prediction, say a week ago and then left. Either he put the $1 million in B2, or he did not. “If the money is already there, it will stay there whatever you choose. It is not going to disappear. If it is not already there, it is not going to suddenly appear if you choose only what is in the second box.” It is assumed that no “backward causality” is operating; that is, your present actions cannot influence what the Being did last week. So why not take both boxes and get everything that is there? If B2 is filled, you get $1,001,000. If it is empty, you get at least $1,000. If you are so foolish as to take only B2, you know you cannot get more than $1 million, and there is even a slight possibility of getting nothing. Clearly it is to your advantage to take both boxes!”

I don’t know if it was clear to you guys that the obvious choice would be to choose both boxes, but i saw that right away, this wasn’t a very good one but I did kind of like it.

“Proof that there exists a unicorn

I wish to prove to you that there exists a unicorn. To do this it obviously suffices to prove the (possibly) stronger statement that there exists an existing unicorn. (By an existing unicorn I of course mean one that exists.) Surely if there exists an existing unicorn, then there must exist a unicorn. So all I have to do is prove that an existing unicorn exists. Well, there are exactly two possibilities:

(1) An existing unicorn exists.

(2) An existing unicorn does not exist.

Possibility (2) is clearly contradictory: How could an existing unicorn not exist? Just as it is true that a blue unicorn is necessarily blue, an existing unicorn must necessarily be existing.”

This next one is good :]

“Poaching on the hunting preserves of a powerful prince was punishable by death, but the prince further decreed that anyone caught poaching was to be given the privilege of deciding whether he should be hanged or beheaded. The culprit was permitted to make a statement - if it were false, he was to be hanged; if it were true, he was to be beheaded. One logical rogue availed himself of this dubious prerogative - to be hanged if he didn’t and to be beheaded if he did - by stating: ‘I shall be hanged.’ Here was a dilemma not anticipated. For, as the poacher put it, ‘If you now hang me, you break the laws made by the prince, for my statement is true, and I ought to be beheaded, but if you behead me, you are also breaking the laws, for then what I said was false and I should therefore be hanged.’”

“Olbers’ paradox - why is the night sky dark?

… the apparent paradox, stated in 1826 and now explained by postulating a finite expanding universe, that the sky is dark at night although, as there are an infinite number of stars, it should be uniformly bright.”

“[A man condemned to be hanged] was sentenced on Saturday. “The hanging will take place at noon,” said the judge to the prisoner, “on one of the seven days of next week. But you will not know which day it is until you are so informed on the morning of the day of the hanging.”

The judge was known to be a man who always kept his word. The prisoner, accompanied by his lawyer, went back to his cell. As soon as the two men were alone, the lawyer broke into a grin. “Don’t you see?” he exclaimed. “The judge’s sentence cannot possibly be carried out.”

“I don’t see,” said the prisoner.

“Let me explain They obviously can’t hang you next Saturday. Saturday is the last day of the week. On Friday afternoon you would still be alive and you would know with absolute certainty that the hanging would be on Saturday. You would know this before you were told so on Saturday morning. That would violate the judge’s decree.”

“True,” said the prisoner.

“Saturday, then is positively ruled out,” continued the lawyer. “This leaves Friday as the last day they can hang you. But they can’t hang you on Friday because by Thursday only two days would remain: Friday and Saturday. Since Saturday is not a possible day, the hanging would have to be on Friday. Your knowledge of that fact would violate the judge’s decree again. So Friday is out. This leaves Thursday as the last possible day. But Thursday is out because if you’re alive Wednesday afternoon, you’ll know that Thursday is to be the day.”

“I get it,” said the prisoner, who was beginning to feel much better. “In exactly the same way I can rule out Wednesday, Tuesday and Monday. That leaves only tomorrow. But they can’t hang me tomorrow because I know it today!”

… He is convinced, by what appears to be unimpeachable logic, that he cannot be hanged without contradicting the conditions specified in his sentence. Then on Thursday morning, to his great surprise, the hangman arrives. Clearly he did not expect him. What is more surprising, the judge’s decree is now seen to be perfectly correctly. The sentence can be carried out exactly as stated.”

“In a certain village there is a man, so the paradox runs, who is a barber; this barber shaves all and only those men in the village who do not shave themselves. Query: Does the barber shave himself?

Any man in this village is shaved by the barber if and only if he is not shaved by himself. Therefore in particular the barber shaves himself if and only if he does not. We are in trouble if we say the barber shaves himself and we are in trouble if we say he does not.

What are we to say to the argument that goes to prove this unacceptable conclusion? Happily it rests on assumptions. We are asked to swallow a story about a village and a man in it who shaves all and only those men in the village who do not shave themselves. This is the source of our trouble; grant this and we end up saying, absurdly, that the barber shaves himself only if he does not. The proper conclusion to draw is just that there is no such barber. We are confronted with nothing more than what logicians have been referring to for a couple of thousand years as a reductio ad absurdum . We disprove the barber by assuming him and deducing the absurdity that he shaves himself if and only if he does not. The paradox is simply a proof that no village can contain a man who shaves all and only those men in it who do not shave themselves.”

“Proving that 2 = 1

Here is the version offered by Augustus De Morgan: Let x = 1. Then x² = x. So x² - 1 = x -1. Dividing both sides by x -1, we conclude that x + 1 = 1; that is, since x = 1, 2 = 1.

Assume that

a = b. (1)

Multiplying both sides by a,

a² = ab. (2)

Subtracting b² from both sides,

a² - b² = ab - b² . (3)

Factorizing both sides,

(a + b)(a - b) = b(a - b). (4)

Dividing both sides by (a - b),

a + b = b. (5)

If now we take a = b = 1, we conclude that 2 = 1. Or we can subtract b from both sides and conclude that a, which can be taken as any number, must be equal to zero. Or we can substitute b for a and conclude that any number is double itself. Our result can thus be interpreted in a number of ways, all equally ridiculous.

The paradox arises from a disguised breach of the arithmetical prohibition on division by zero, occurring at (5): since a = b, dividing both sides by (a - b) is dividing by zero, which renders the equation meaningless. As Northrop goes on to show, the same trick can be used to prove, e.g., that any two unequal numbers are equal, or that all positive whole numbers are equal.”

All of these. and more, can be found at:

http://www.paradoxes.co.uk/

The ending of life. That you dont care about.

If you were to die, what would be some way that you didn’t want to die?

I’m going to list a few ways how I would definitely (click on the word definitely. I found this site completely randomly) not wanna die.

• Jumping off a building
• Being eaten alive by cannibals
• No wait scratch that, being eaten alive, in general. I don’t care by what i just don’t want to be eaten alive.
• Being hit by a car and slowly die
• Being shot and slowly bleed to death
• Skydiving accident. Ok not just any accident. If i die because I land incorrectly that’s ok, but if my parachute doesn’t open then that’s a problem.
• Attacked by 798172983179283712073109872 spiders
• Beaten to death
• Killed by a loved one
• Slowly tortured until i died
• Poisoned
• Stabbed repeatedly
• Shot with bow and arrows
• Fall into a giant fan
• Trip and fall off the Grand Canyon
• Murdered

Ok never mind on that last one. I’m a very important person so if i was murdered it would be called an assassination. :]

If i had to choose one though i would pick jumping off a building. Seems like the least painful.

30th blog post!!!

Yesssss!!!!!!!!!

This is my 30th blog post!!!!!!!!!!!

Aren’t you proud?

:]

This blog was pretty much pointless.

Here’s a picture of an angry dog.

Grrrrrrrr.

Rawr.

Bark.

Resident Evil 5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not that you care. I do.

“Yes, it is true Resident Evil fans, the launch date of Resident Evil 5, which will be for PS3 and the Xbox 360, is pushed back to 2009! But not to worry, this just means that the team at Capcom is working hard to make the latest installment of the Resident Evil franchise better than ever. Despite the pushed back release date, parts of the story and news on the gameplay have been revealed.

According to the Japanese video game magazine Famitsu, the story revolves around Chris Redfield and takes place about 10 years after the original Resident Evil. With Chris being the main character, much of his life will be revealed as to what happened to him during the interim of the original Resident Evil and Resident Evil 5. From the footage from the trailer, which can be found on Gamtrailers.com, it is seen that Chris is part of a group called BSAA sent to investigate some incident that is taking place in the desert where some freak accident occurs and the people are infected with something causing them to be overly aggressive.

As for gameplay, it will somewhat resemble a Resident Evil 4 feeling, but with some new features. One of the latest features to be revealed is the role of the environment in the game. If the player controls Chris in the sun too much, Chris will begin to hallucinate and see mirages. Also, if the player goes from a bright place to a dark place, the player will momentarily lose vision on the screen as Chris will have to adjust his eyes to the surroundings. How realistic can that get?! It seems that Capcom is putting some hard work into Resident Evil 5 to make it one of the best games of the franchise.

Also, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, the game’s former producer, said that this game will pick up where Resident Evil 4 ended.

Resident Evil 5 will surely capture the attention of gamers everywhere. With Chris Redfield being the main character once more, fans of the original Resident Evil will certainly want to pick this game up once it is released in 2009. With a new set of enemies and a different setting, Resident Evil 5 seems more deadly and thrilling than the games before it. The question is: Will you make it out alive?” -Von Jared Omo at http://www.ps3informer.com

I didn’t feel like writing about it and this guy did a pretty good job, so i just copied and pasted. haha :]

Anywayyyyy I can’t wait until this game comes out. Only one more year until the sequel for Resident Evil 4 comes out.

Resident Evil 4

Resident Evil 5 screenshot

Notice how all the zombies are black, no Capcom’s Resident Evil 5 isn’t racist, although for someone reason many people believe the game is very offensive because the village is only black people, the game takes place in Africa what do you expect? I highly doubt that the small villages there are gonna be filled with anything else other than black people.

If you haven’t noticed I am a HUGE fan of the Resident Evil series. Definitely the best thing to happen to this world :]

Wikipedia incident that you don’t care about

Well I made a Wikipedia article about myself and uhhh it was deleted like 4 times.

After the fourth time they banned me. :]

Yeahhh…..well i tried. four times. and failed. four times. I was pretty much super mega banned.

“A usual block prevents users from editing all pages except their user talk page. Users are allowed to retain editing access to their user talk page, in order to have a chance for appeal, and so that they are not shut out completely and are able to participate at least to some degree in Wikipedia, whilst the block is active.” - Wikipedia

They also blocked “my user talk page”. So I wasn’t normally blocked. I was super mega banned.

An administrator from Wikipedia said (and i quote), “The article claimed that the subject was born in 1342 in Atlantis and invented the time machine - go play somewhere else”

Hahaha

The following is what i wrote :

Manuel Wong, Born on the date of June 6th, 1342, is possibly the coolest person ever. He was born the metropolis that is Atlantis. He is a wizard and has magical powers. The role he plays, in the epic dramatic story we call “Life”, is a great one. From being the main hero to civilian #1 he never disappoints. Greater than Thor (god of thunder), himself. Since the age of 4 he has done nothing but improved the world we live in. At the age of five he invented the time machine (which one day he will get around to actually building it). He is currently at the age of 666 and does not foresee death in his future any time soon, or ever for that matter. Since he is well acquainted with Marlok (King of the purple leprechauns) the purple leprechauns have given him the gift of eternal life. He could have given that gift to anyone, but he decided he doesn’t like you. Also since he is best friends with Zeus, Zeus and his god buddies decided to make Manuel the god of time (As for Phoenician, the Greek god of time before Manuel, he decided to retire and move to Florida. Manuel is well acquainted with many people and mythical beings, one of his good friends is Josh who has been granted (Manuel ruler of the underworld, gave him this power) the ability to have sex with whomever he wishes by just snapping his fingers. Sadly, this never works. Today he is a laid back high school student that wishes to be a graphic designer eventually. Now of days you can catch him hanging out with friends or inventing more things that help the world, or curing cancer.

go me :]

My own wikipedia page that you don’t care about

Yep. I’m making my own wikipedia page. About myself. :]

I’m very bored.

I’ll tell you when i have it completed.

:]

URL’s that lead to my blog :]]

I have registered a few domains that lead straight to my blog.

And I will now list them.

Why you may ask.
Because i fucking can.

Thats why.

1. www.dontbe.scared.at
2. www.doyou.thinkbig.at
3. www.manny.says.it
4. www.mannysfckingsuperawesomeblog.owns.it
5. www.youloveitbecausemanny.makes.it
6. www.manny.has.it
7. www.mannyiskindof.thirsty.at
8. www.youwerenot.hacked.at
9. www.mannywritesblogs.allday.at

And of course the original

10. www.manny135.wordpress.com/

There you go. Go ahead try them :]

I know what your thinking. So to answer what your thinking, “Yes, Damn right I’m cool.”

Or “STFU”

Or “Please?”

Or “Only for a dollar”

Choose the reply that makes the most sense for what you were thinking.

Josh’s blog that you don’t care about.

http://ps123fan07.wordpress.com/

He needs more blog views.

Go ahead, read his inferior blog post.

They are very uninteresting. While mine are amazing.

Please. Shelter a homeless. Feed a starving child. Or I’ll beat you.